by al-Najashi on Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:47 pm
Sorry, I understand that "puritan" within a Christian context is not a negative, however, in Khaled M. Abou El Fadl's book, "The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists" he makes a sincere attempt to differentiate between various reformist movements, basically stating that there are those within the reformist movement who are conservative and want to return to an understanding of some of the earliest sources, but this doesn't mean they want to radically interpret them. His category for the radical element was puritan, maybe it's not the best term esp. when considering interfaith dialogue, but his point is understood, that just because someone believes in the truth of Islam and wants to follow it in today's world--doesn't make them a radical, and secondly, doesn't make them pro-Western.
Here's one of his quotes I have posted on my site:
“Most moderates, however, strongly disagree with Western, and especially U.S., foreign policies toward the Muslim world, and especially the Middle East. Moderates disagree about the objectives or reasons behind these policies, but most moderates are particularly displeased with the unequivocal support Israel receives from the United States at the expense of the Palestinians. However, one of the distinguishing characteristics of the moderates, as opposed to the puritans, is that they do not believe that the clash between Muslims and the West is inevitable. More significantly, moderates believe that the way for Muslims to progress and for their countries to become more democratic and developed is to engage in self-reflection and self-criticism and to work to address the causes of underdevelopment in Muslim countries.” (The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists, 2005, p178).
-Chris